Perkins Reverses Policy...
Author |
Message |
joelr
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:06 pm |
|
The Man |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3.gif) |
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am Posts: 7970 Location: Minneapolis MN
|
I dunno, maybe, something like, "After hearing about the hassle that the other guy got from your manager, I'm glad to hear that you don't have a policy about carry permit holders, but kind of wish I knew what your policy was about managers who hassle patrons who aren't doing anything wrong -- I know that they fire folks for that at Denny's."
_________________ Just a guy.
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
mrokern
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:48 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2169_1246998412.jpg) |
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm Posts: 2264 Location: Eden Prairie
|
Got the call (message) placed (been busy today). We'll see what I get back...
-Mark
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
bstrawse
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:27 pm |
|
Senior Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2775_1298775364.jpg) |
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:51 pm Posts: 172
|
Looks like this has turned out well!
I haven't heard from anyone yet :/ b
_________________ NRA Life Member | NRA & MADFI Instructor | NRA Chief Range Safety Officer | Blog | Twitter | Facebook My views are my own - they may or may not reflect those of my employer.
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
diskdoctr@yahoo.com
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:12 pm |
|
Journeyman Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2837_1247492701.gif) |
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 8:34 am Posts: 85 Location: Northwest Suburbs
|
Same call from Bill today.. At least this has stirred some discussion and by the sounds I would say that the locations that have signs won't for long
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
old guy
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:57 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:51 am Posts: 61 Location: NE mpls MN
|
After reading this post this evening the Wife and I went to that Perkins location for dinner, there was no manager on duty just a shift leader and I told her the only reason we came there to eat was the change in gun policy, she said she had not heard of any change.I told her she would soon. I was not oc and no more was said. the food and service was good
John
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
diskdoctr@yahoo.com
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:42 pm |
|
Journeyman Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2837_1247492701.gif) |
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 8:34 am Posts: 85 Location: Northwest Suburbs
|
old guy wrote: After reading this post this evening the Wife and I went to that Perkins location for dinner, there was no manager on duty just a shift leader and I told her the only reason we came there to eat was the change in gun policy, she said she had not heard of any change.I told her she would soon. I was not oc and no more was said. the food and service was good
John Was it still posted, or was that location ever posted?
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
realtor_packing_heat
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:50 pm |
|
Senior Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2677.jpg) |
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:32 pm Posts: 180 Location: St. Paul
|
I got the call from Bill today and I have to say that I am very impressed that he took the time to call all of us personally. I was so impressed that I took the wife there for dinner tonight. I have always liked Perkins and I am very happy with this outcome.
Good job everyone!
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
old guy
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:27 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:51 am Posts: 61 Location: NE mpls MN
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Moby Clarke
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:40 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=108.gif) |
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:09 pm Posts: 965 Location: North Minneapolis
|
Andrew Rothman wrote: Moby Clarke wrote: Bill and his bosses, after receiving many emails from you guys, I am sure, have come to the understanding that they will not have a policy on guns. They will treat each instance on it own merits. That's less than optimal. "No policy" means letting their restaurant managers, however ignorant or hoplophobic, to make the rules. Walmart, in contrast, has a corporate policy: legal carry in Walmart stores is just fine with them. That's what we want. Sure, Andrew, you could see it that way. On the other hand, and this is the sense I got, they are rescinding the knee-jerk "let's ban guns" policy that came out of my initial email and have returned to a neutral policy; one very much in accordance with all other groups that they have not banned. I am pretty sure if you asked them what their written policy is on serving people wearing glasses and having facial hair they would not have one. That is what I took as their stand on folks with guns to be. Now, just as they would with those glasses wearing, goateed folks, anyone carrying a gun and causing true problems will be dealt with accordingly. Those who just come in and have no issues will be left alone. I do not believe manager discretion will be part of it. Is there anyway to prevent that? Sure, with a written policy. However, then they will need one for every other group of people and that is just not practical. I took Bill at his word that each instance will be handled individually, just as every instance of be-speckled, bearded women coming in to the restaurant is. I do believe our emails made a big impact on their thinking, showing them that knee-jerk reactions can have financial consequences.
_________________ It is about Liberty!
Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Chris
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
realtor_packing_heat
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:49 pm |
|
Senior Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2677.jpg) |
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:32 pm Posts: 180 Location: St. Paul
|
Moby Clarke wrote: Andrew Rothman wrote: Moby Clarke wrote: Bill and his bosses, after receiving many emails from you guys, I am sure, have come to the understanding that they will not have a policy on guns. They will treat each instance on it own merits. That's less than optimal. "No policy" means letting their restaurant managers, however ignorant or hoplophobic, to make the rules. Walmart, in contrast, has a corporate policy: legal carry in Walmart stores is just fine with them. That's what we want. Sure, Andrew, you could see it that way. On the other hand, and this is the sense I got, they are rescinding the knee-jerk "let's ban guns" policy that came out of my initial email and have returned to a neutral policy; one very much in accordance with all other groups that they have not banned. I am pretty sure if you asked them what their written policy is on serving people wearing glasses and having facial hair they would not have one. That is what I took as their stand on folks with guns to be. Now, just as they would with those glasses wearing, goateed folks, anyone carrying a gun and causing true problems will be dealt with accordingly. Those who just come in and have no issues will be left alone. I do not believe manager discretion will be part of it. Is there anyway to prevent that? Sure, with a written policy. However, then they will need one for every other group of people and that is just not practical. I took Bill at his word that each instance will be handled individually, just as every instance of be-speckled, bearded women coming in to the restaurant is. I do believe our emails made a big impact on their thinking, showing them that knee-jerk reactions can have financial consequences. +1 I couldn't agree more.
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
larryflew
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:58 pm |
|
Senior Member |
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2829_1246209341.jpg) |
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 2:07 pm Posts: 112 Location: Young America
|
people wearing glasses and having facial hair and I'd be carrying too, I guess I'm a goner for sure.
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
MNXD9
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:47 am |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:48 am Posts: 232
|
Nice! thanks for the hard work guys! ![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif) I was going to write a letter myself, but I thought there was enough flooding thier offices, I write a thank you and will continue to visit your restaurants type of thing.
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
crshooter
|
Post subject: Re: Perkins Reverses Policy... Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:15 pm Posts: 54
|
This seemed to have worked well. We should do more e-mail, letter writting, and phone calling with the rest of the places on "the list".
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|