Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:33 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 Public opinion consequences of refusing to talk to the media 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 2:53 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 373
Nords wrote:
I will again play devils advocate, because I think people should consider both sides of any topic, before coming to a conclusion, especially one that could have direct implications in how the rest of your life ends up ;)...



Do you have a permit to carry? If so the consideration and conclusions should have already have taken place in your class.

The sides to this "topic" are VERY clear.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08fZQWjDVKE

_________________

In a big country dreams stay with you, like a lover's voice fires the mountainside. Stay alive.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Public opinion consequences of refusing to talk to the m
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 3:10 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 373
MostlyHarmless wrote:
And I think, as general advice from a carry permit instructor to a student, Andrew's comment is appropriate. But let's look at the specifics of the incident and see whether it still applies:

1. Unlike a statement made to a cop, Ersland's statement to the reporter isn't admissible in court.
2. The presence of multiple witnesses and physical evidence leave little room for doubt regarding what happened.
3. The nature of Ersland's work and the way the robbery took place make it difficult to second-guess his actions or ascribe ulterior motives (compared to, say, someone encountering trouble after leaving a party or drinking establishment in the wee hours).



Your points above are completely facetious. Have you really looked into what the Minnesota and federal rules of evidence actually are? Do you understand that in DGU you can face both criminal & CIVIL charges?

_________________

In a big country dreams stay with you, like a lover's voice fires the mountainside. Stay alive.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 3:16 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 85
Location: Northwest Suburbs
I don't understand what the issue is!!! You simply do not speak without representation.. That's all there is to it. Name, address, and maybe a phone number to the investigating officer and then you shut up.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group