I think that the assymmetrical answer to that poll ( in which I voted) would be a similarly "open-minded" poll on this or similar gun forums with the rigorous PR- emailing campaign.
With the "preambula" like they have.
"...Brady campaign is the filthy political anti-American, terrorist organization. To what degree do you agree that they should be held accountable (up to Guantanamo or a death penalty) for death of innocent inner-city American (mostly minorities) children (remember- it's all about children
) from guns supplied by the DEA to the drug dealing "informants"?
or
Sarah Brady is a female and unjustifiably goes through thousands of feminine napkins every month, overwhelming the local dump and environment of Washington, D.C.
How strongly do you agree that sale of feminine napkins should be restricted to 3 per month to all unattractive balding women with soggy hinds?"
Hey, I see it that the gun commumity is in "defensive" mode, trying to honestly defend or to clarify, explain to the "hysterical mothers and their metrosexual spouses" the whole gun issue. And at the same time the other side is not playing by the rules, but rather using the results of many years-long policy of Ritalin, Prosac, weed, meth brain killing of general public to "form opinion".
Yes, I realize the work done by the NRA, however I am more prone to believe the grassroots approach, I "edgimicate" one person, one cop, one State official at the time without ambush tactics of Brady or sensationalist dishonesty of the local "news" channels (recent Bloomington scare).
eye for an eye, poll for a poll