Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:25 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 13 posts ] 
 Never ending legislative sessions proposed. 
Author Message
 Post subject: Never ending legislative sessions proposed.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:52 pm 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
These are ready for a floor vote as soon as the DFL has the votes.

The power to call a special session could be in the hands of others than just the governor.

Awaiting action by the House Rules and Legislative Administration Committee is HF2554, sponsored by Rep. Lyndon Carlson (DFL-Crystal). It was approved by the House Ways and Means Committee on a divided voice vote.

The bill proposes a constitutional amendment be put before state voters at this year’s general election. It would allow the Legislature to be called into session by the leadership in both bodies or by a petition among the majority of members in each body. Now, only the governor can call a special session.

A session would be limited to seven days; however, there is no provision indicating the session could not be extended another seven days through a leadership agreement or another petition, thus creating a full-time Legislature seven days at a time.

A companion bill, SF3072, sponsored by Sen. Ann Rest (DFL-New Hope), awaits action by the Senate Rules and Administration Committee.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:40 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 144
This strikes me as a bad thing... the more time they have in session, the more time they have to scew things up.

_________________
Midwest Marksman
Wisconsin Shooters (USPSA, 3-Gun, IDPA)
MADFI Certified Instructor (#60)


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:51 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:09 am
Posts: 983
Location: Brewster
mpthole wrote:
This strikes me as a bad thing... the more time they have in session, the more time they have to scew things up.


Trust your instincts. I think you nailed it.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:13 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:54 am
Posts: 2444
Location: West Central MN
I think it's probably a device to defend against a veto at the end of a session. Right now if a bill passes on the last day, and the gov vetoes it a after the end of the session, the veto stands. Only the gov can call them back before next year.

But with the power to call their own session, they could come back and overide.

They could also turn the legislature into a full time job, Maybe, with no deadline, they'd get even LESS done.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:08 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:11 am
Posts: 572
Location: West of Hope, MN (S. Central MN)
Dick Unger wrote:

Quote:
they'd get even LESS done


This may be a good thing.

I agree fully with your statement that if they can call a special session, they will make the legislature a full time one.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:24 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
We need an amendment to max out their per diems before the special sessions. Any extra time is on their own bloody nickel. That'd keep it to a minimum.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:00 am 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
Andrew Rothman wrote:
We need an amendment to max out their per diems before the special sessions. Any extra time is on their own bloody nickel. That'd keep it to a minimum.
I wish I agreed; I think it's the power, not the money.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:58 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: SE MPLS
Dick Unger wrote:
I think it's probably a device to defend against a veto at the end of a session. Right now if a bill passes on the last day, and the gov vetoes it a after the end of the session, the veto stands. Only the gov can call them back before next year.

But with the power to call their own session, they could come back and overide.

Or, of course, they could get their bills finished on time, instead of putting things off to the last minute.

Isn't it Texas that has a legislative session limited to 45 days every other year?

If I were King, the legislature would meet outdoors, on folding chairs, on Pike Island, in August.

And, of course, I'd require that the first and second readings be complete readings of the text, and that a quorum be present for both.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:15 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
jdege wrote:
[I'd require that the first and second readings be complete readings of the text, and that a quorum be present for both.


THAT is a great idea. I got the impression that some people on the committee hadn't really read HF 498 the other day for example. Even more important, I got the impression that some people testifying and others there for support hadn't either.

_________________
Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com)
Click here for current Carry Classes
"There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:18 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:02 am
Posts: 1684
Location: St Louis Park
jdege wrote:
[

If I were King, the legislature would meet outdoors, on folding chairs, on Pike Island, in August.



Nah. January.

_________________
Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.

--------------------
Next MN carry permit class: TBD.

Permit to Carry MN
--------------------

jason <at> metrodefense <dot> com


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:09 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:40 am
Posts: 3752
Location: East Suburbs
princewally wrote:
jdege wrote:
[

If I were King, the legislature would meet outdoors, on folding chairs, on Pike Island, in August.



Nah. January.


With no coats! :twisted:

_________________
Srigs

Side Guard Holsters
"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking" - George S. Patton


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:41 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 1569
Location: The Mild, Mild, West, Burbs
Srigs wrote:
princewally wrote:
jdege wrote:
[

If I were King, the legislature would meet outdoors, on folding chairs, on Pike Island, in August.



Nah. January.


With no coats! :twisted:


You're a Hard man Srigs!!

Let em have coats....and gloves, but no other toys to keep em warm.

:D :D :D :D :D

_________________
NRA Certified Instructor
MADFI Certified Instructor
MN DNR Certified Instructor
UT BCI Certified Conceal/Carry Instructor


"If you expect the police to always be able to protect you, why are the ones who show up at crimes called 'detectives' instead of 'defenders'? Detectives try to find a criminal after they've committed a crime."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:45 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:02 am
Posts: 1684
Location: St Louis Park
Selurcspi wrote:
Srigs wrote:
princewally wrote:
jdege wrote:
[

If I were King, the legislature would meet outdoors, on folding chairs, on Pike Island, in August.



Nah. January.


With no coats! :twisted:


You're a Hard man Srigs!!

Let em have coats....and gloves, but no other toys to keep em warm.

:D :D :D :D :D


That's the ticket. No interns!

_________________
Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.

--------------------
Next MN carry permit class: TBD.

Permit to Carry MN
--------------------

jason <at> metrodefense <dot> com


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 13 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group