Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:20 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 Another Camera Issue 
Author Message
 Post subject: Another Camera Issue
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:00 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:09 pm
Posts: 965
Location: North Minneapolis
I thought squad camera's were always on once lights or siren were activated. I guess MPD have special camera's?

From the 4th Precinct Advisory Council site.

Sunday – 0034 hours – 31st & 3rd St – 07-408609. Officers stop a vehicle with four occupants and smell a strong odor of marijuana. Upon removing the occupants they recover numerous baggies of powder cocaine and 10 tabs of ecstasy. Officers turned on the squad camera and got recording of the suspects offering up ownership of narcotics.

http://www.4pac.org/community/viewtopic.php?t=153

_________________
It is about Liberty!

Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Chris


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Another Camera Issue
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:13 am 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
Quote:
smell a strong odor of marijuana.......... recover numerous baggies of powder cocaine and 10 tabs of ecstasy

I didn't know cocaine and ecstasy smelled like marijuana. :shock:


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:37 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:54 am
Posts: 1242
Now Cobb... You aren't suggesting the 'good officers' may have fabricated the smell of Pot in the air? :lol:

I read that - but didn't make the linkage of 'smell of Mar...' and found 'not pot'


Mostly-


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:33 am 
Forum Moderator/<br>AV Geek
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:56 am
Posts: 2422
Location: Hopkins, MN
mostlylawabidingcitizen wrote:
... and found 'not pot'

I like that. Funny.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:41 am 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
OK, guys, I think you're going off the deep end a bit here. It's entirely possible that the officers smelled pot- if the suspects had been smoking it in the car, they and the car are gonna reek. I can't count the number of times in warmer weather I've been driving with my windows open and caught that distinctive smell from 2 or 3 cars away. So, they stop on suspicion of MJ, find no pot, but do find other illegal substances. Where's the issue here? It's certainly a teaching moment- don't drive around high if you're transporting other stuff...

As far as the cameras, that's simply a matter of how they're wired up. I'd suppose that each department has it's own specifications- apparently, MPD's are on a separate switch.

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:22 am 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
Jeremiah wrote:
It's certainly a teaching moment- don't drive around high if you're transporting other stuff...

Here I disagree. How about this teaching moment, don't do drugs. :x


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:34 am 
Forum Moderator/<br>AV Geek
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:56 am
Posts: 2422
Location: Hopkins, MN
Either do them, or transport them, not both.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:57 pm 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
cobb wrote:
Jeremiah wrote:
It's certainly a teaching moment- don't drive around high if you're transporting other stuff...

Here I disagree. How about this teaching moment, don't do drugs. :x


I agree entirely. I lump them both under my personal rule #1:

1) Don't be stupid.

2) Don't be an asshole.

Basically, the stuff most folks learned in kindergarten. These four brain surgeons (*ahem*, "underprivileged persons") obviously missed that day... :wink:

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:13 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
MPD dash cams activate as soon as the officer starts the flashing lights. However, the officer CAN switch the camera off remotely by hitting a button on his microphone pack, or by hitting a button inside the squad car.

It seems obvious to me that this needs to be changed: cameras should run whenever the lights are activated. Actually, with today's technology, and given the issues of police credibility, cameras and microphones should run the whole damn shift.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:48 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:28 pm
Posts: 2362
Location: Uptown Minneapolis
What's more, they should be simul-cast, here on the internet, live. But that would be too much like democracy...

_________________
"The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible." - Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, 1960

"Man has the right to deal with his oppressors by devouring their palpitating hearts." - Jean-Paul Marat


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:06 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 124
Or at very least stored for 30 days so that if complaints arise they still have them.

_________________
But if “bear
arms” means, as the petitioners and the dissent think, the
Opinion of the Court
carrying of arms only for military purposes, one simply
cannot add “for the purpose of killing game.” The right “to
carry arms in the militia for the purpose of killing game”
is worthy of the mad hatter.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:35 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:35 pm
Posts: 71
Location: Shakopee
Andrew Rothman wrote:
It seems obvious to me that this needs to be changed: cameras should run whenever the lights are activated. Actually, with today's technology, and given the issues of police credibility, cameras and microphones should run the whole damn shift.


Damn straight! And they should have to wear shock collars so their handlers can correct their behavior via remote control. Plus there should be a remote control safety switch on their guns, batons and handcuffs that can only be deactivated by management. No sense in letting them make their own decisions when higher authority would only be a phone call away.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:43 am 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
MP9 wrote:
No sense in letting them make their own decisions when ...


...they are so often wrong. And a wrong decision gets an innocent civilian hurt.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:50 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Are you implying that accountability would hinder the cops in doing their jobs? I can't think of any reason for your ad absurdum statement.

Of course cops need to make independent judgments. Do you not agree that those decisions should be transparently open to review?

MP9 wrote:
Andrew Rothman wrote:
It seems obvious to me that this needs to be changed: cameras should run whenever the lights are activated. Actually, with today's technology, and given the issues of police credibility, cameras and microphones should run the whole damn shift.


Damn straight! And they should have to wear shock collars so their handlers can correct their behavior via remote control. Plus there should be a remote control safety switch on their guns, batons and handcuffs that can only be deactivated by management. No sense in letting them make their own decisions when higher authority would only be a phone call away.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:27 pm 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
kimberman wrote:
MP9 wrote:
No sense in letting them make their own decisions when ...


...they are so often wrong. And a wrong decision gets an innocent civilian hurt.
Wrong decisions are unavoidable.

What the cops controlling the cameras means, though, that wrong decisions, no matter how bad they might be, are unreviewable, unaccounted and unaccountable, and far closer to unpreventable.

That said, while there are some definite downsides to the notion of privacy in public space largely become a quaint memory of a bygone era, the decreasing size and price of cameras means that there may well be more than a squad camera recording a specific scene, and that may end up being a check on some kinds of bad behavior at some times.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group