Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Fri May 03, 2024 7:02 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Why you should refuse a FST and demand the BAT 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:28 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 810
Location: Northern MN
bkrafft wrote:
This is why you should belch as vociferously as you can just before you blow. A burp can bring fresh alcohol from your stomach up into your esophagus and mouth, throwing the reading off, so in theory they have to wait another 15 minutes (some states it's 30 minutes) before they can make you blow again.


If the test is "unreasonably delayed" it can be considered a refusal. But remember, there are a boatload of attorneys who make their living from challenging the implied consent and test..

Like you said, don't drink & drive. :!:

_________________
Proud, Service Oriented, Rural LEO, or "BADGED COWBOY"
Certified MN Carry Permit Instructor


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:29 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:30 pm
Posts: 180
Location: Twin Cities
bkrafft wrote:
This is why you should belch as vociferously as you can just before you blow. A burp can bring fresh alcohol from your stomach up into your esophagus and mouth, throwing the reading off, so in theory they have to wait another 15 minutes (some states it's 30 minutes) before they can make you blow again.

Yes, that's exactly what you should do...

...if you want to get charged with Refusal to Submit to Testing. It isn't just the people who say "no" to a test request that get charged with refusal. It's also people who refuse by conduct, such as intentionally doing things that mess with the test. You'd be surprised how inclined judges are to interpret innocent behavior as mischief.

Another consideration is that if there's still alcohol in your stomach that means it hasn't fully made it's way into your bloodstream. Give it some more time and it likely will, leading to a higher reading. That 0.19 reading might be 0.18 in 15 minutes, but it might also be 0.20, which subjects you to a more serious charge.

Besides, a smart cop will let you belch away and run the test anyway. You'll bring a bunch of alcohol up from your stomach to your mouth, and your test will be twice what it otherwise would be. Then, when he gets to court, he won't have a specific recollection of any burp, but he'll be real sure that it would have been his ordinary practice to start the observation period over again if it did happen.

Then you are, to use the legal term, pretty much f***ed.

_________________
"We, as criminal defense lawyers, are forced to deal with some of the lowest people on earth, people who have no sense of right and wrong, people who will lie in court to get what they want, people who do not care who gets hurt in the process. It is our job – our sworn duty as criminal defense lawyers – to protect our clients from those people." -- Cynthia Rosenberry, a DePaul University law professor, criminal defense attorney and founding member of the Georgia Innocence Project


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group