|
|
|
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:16 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
 |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Interesting reading from our "friends" at the U.N.
| Author |
Message |
|
reaver3
|
Post subject: Interesting reading from our "friends" at the U.N.  Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:10 pm |
|
| Activist Extraordinaire |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 546
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
|
_________________
Respectfully,
Doug
"Some Things Are Worth Fighting For"
Judas Priest
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
lance22
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:52 pm |
|
| Longtime Regular |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:02 am
Posts: 817
Location: Eagan, MN
|
|
If you read it, start at page 24. That's where it gets interesting. They talk about the regulation of ammo, information gathering on purchasers of ammo, et cetera. Very much like they do at WalMart. "Is this for a handgun?" they ask.
A couple pages later they talk about regulating the firearm, two pages after that regulating the firearm owner. Very interesting stuff and all of it things we see proposed here in the States constantly.
Also note when they outline the steps toward outlawing guns, the implementation of new laws is step #8. Most of what they do leads up to that point ... info gathering and policy discussion and record keeping are the biggest precursors.
BTW, Nancy Pelosi has come out and said that "gun registration" is on her agenda. Now, we already have elaborate record keeping at the FFL level, elaborate transport and commerce laws. They know every gun being made, every gun being imported, and a record of every sale.
But that's not enough "registration". They want more. Yikes. You know what that means.
_________________
Clinging to guns and religion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mrokern
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:24 pm |
|
| Longtime Regular |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
|
lance22 wrote: If you read it, start at page 24. That's where it gets interesting. They talk about the regulation of ammo, information gathering on purchasers of ammo, et cetera. Very much like they do at WalMart. "Is this for a handgun?" they ask.
A couple pages later they talk about regulating the firearm, two pages after that regulating the firearm owner. Very interesting stuff and all of it things we see proposed here in the States constantly.
Also note when they outline the steps toward outlawing guns, the implementation of new laws is step #8. Most of what they do leads up to that point ... info gathering and policy discussion and record keeping are the biggest precursors.
BTW, Nancy Pelosi has come out and said that "gun registration" is on her agenda. Now, we already have elaborate record keeping at the FFL level, elaborate transport and commerce laws. They know every gun being made, every gun being imported, and a record of every sale.
But that's not enough "registration". They want more. Yikes. You know what that means. Sorry. I sold all my guns before registration became mandatory. To whom? Couldn't tell you, like I said, registration wasn't mandatory. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Rothman
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:59 pm |
|
| Longtime Regular |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
|
