Second Amendment applies against a state
Author |
Message |
kimberman
|
Post subject: Second Amendment applies against a state Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:41 am |
|
Wise Elder |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm Posts: 2782 Location: St. Paul
|
|
|
|
|
princewally
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:22 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:02 am Posts: 1684 Location: St Louis Park
|
Quote: For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the County on the Nordykes’ First Amendment and equal protection claims and, although we conclude that the Second Amendment is indeed incorporated against the states, we AFFIRM the district court’s refusal to grant the Nordykes leave to amend their complaint to add a Second Amendment claim in this case.
_________________ Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.
-------------------- Next MN carry permit class: TBD.
Permit to Carry MN --------------------
jason <at> metrodefense <dot> com
|
|
|
|
|
Sietch
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:34 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm Posts: 199 Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
Relying on the bullshit at hand, Judge Danforth concluded...
Also
Quote: King declared she had...“gotten the run around from spineless people hiding behind the constitution, and been attacked by aggressive gun toting mobs on right wing talk radio.”
Grrr. grrrrr.
_________________ "My name is Shosanna Dreyfus. This is the face of Jewish vengeance."
|
|
|
|
|
princewally
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:48 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:02 am Posts: 1684 Location: St Louis Park
|
So, how does a 9th circuit decision affect anyone not in the 9th circuit?
_________________ Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.
-------------------- Next MN carry permit class: TBD.
Permit to Carry MN --------------------
jason <at> metrodefense <dot> com
|
|
|
|
|
plblark
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 4468
|
IIRC, if circuits disagree, it makes it more likely the SC will rule to even things out ...
I'd appreciate a wiser or more experienced answer to your question though as it's a good one.
_________________ Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com) Click here for current Carry Classes "There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke
|
|
|
|
|
Sietch
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:06 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm Posts: 199 Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
The circuit and district stuff just means from what geography the court may entertain cases, whether they come to the federal court initially or hop over from a state/municipal court. The courts' decisions have weight across the board.
_________________ "My name is Shosanna Dreyfus. This is the face of Jewish vengeance."
|
|
|
|
|
Sietch
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:14 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm Posts: 199 Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
I should amend that. By rights the implications of the courts' rulings are widespread. Like AGs in New England might mention 5th District cases in statements and whatnot. But sometimes they come up at odds with each other. Activist or otherwise incredibly reckless judges are the problem. High-horsers.
Of course, what do you expect when appointing someone to that kind of position?
_________________ "My name is Shosanna Dreyfus. This is the face of Jewish vengeance."
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Rothman
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:09 pm |
|
Longtime Regular |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am Posts: 6767 Location: Twin Cities
|
|
|
|
|
Lawyer_in_Training
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:59 am |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:22 pm Posts: 339 Location: Suburban Twin Cities, MN
|
|
|
|
|
Lawyer_in_Training
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:57 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:22 pm Posts: 339 Location: Suburban Twin Cities, MN
|
Here is a summary on one way the Nordyke case could get reviewed by the Supreme Court:
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-guns-chukas-and-the-states/
Quote: None of this, however, would be resolved during the Court’s current Term. ... The Maloney case on “chukas” — and perhaps the Nordyke case on guns, as well — could be ready for the Justices’ action early in the new Term starting in October.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|