Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:37 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 
 Review: HK45? 
Author Message
 Post subject: Review: HK45?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:21 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 8:53 am
Posts: 239
I am probably going to be purchasing a new pistol soon. However, there are a few requirements, it has to have a decocker and hammer (not my choice). Which leaves out the gun I'd like to get, the Springfield XD in .45.

My choices are:

1.) Sig
2.) Beretta
3.) HK
4.) Smith & Wesson (not M&P, no decocker)


I have very small hands, and all of the Sig's that I can choose are bigger gripped, so not good for me. I am looking for something in .45

So I guess, does anyone have any knowledge/review or use with the new HK45?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:08 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 810
Location: Northern MN
Being a Taurus owner, I have to suggest the new Taurus 24/7 OSS. It was designed for the military bid that was put off indefinitely.

I'm not sure of grip width, but it DOES have a decocker.

http://taurususa.com/products/product-d ... ory=Pistol

_________________
Proud, Service Oriented, Rural LEO, or "BADGED COWBOY"
Certified MN Carry Permit Instructor


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:50 am 
On time out
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:18 pm
Posts: 1689
Location: 35 W and Hiway 10
Steve has a couple of HK45's One which used to be mine, I sold mine because it was too big to manage. I have no trouble with double stack Para's but the HK was very long from the rear of the grip to the trigger and on the other side from the reag of the grip to the secondary controls.

_________________
molan labe


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review: HK45?
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:07 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:08 pm
Posts: 267
usmarine0352 wrote:
I am probably going to be purchasing a new pistol soon. However, there are a few requirements, it has to have a decocker and hammer (not my choice). Which leaves out the gun I'd like to get, the Springfield XD in .45.


I'm assuming that your employer is laying down the requirements so this would be a duty gun. I assume, therefore, that you and your weapon will be outside in all kinds of weather. I would look at S&W stainless. S&W's single-stack 45's are reasonably sized. 4566TSW is an all-stainless SA/DA .45 8+1. Shooting .45 in a heavier gun is more comfortable for some.

Personally, if I had the money I would opt for the Sig 220 DAK, but I don't have to stand outside in all kinds of weather.

For what it's worth.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:17 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
tman065 wrote:
...Taurus 24/7 OSS.... but it DOES have a decocker...

But, it doesn't have a hammer.

The new HK's are supposed to have some more human sized grips. The bore-axis is still fairly high for my taste.

Look at the single-stack S&W's.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:55 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 810
Location: Northern MN
DeanC wrote:
But, it doesn't have a hammer.


It might've helped if I'd read the original post a little more carefully.

:oops:

_________________
Proud, Service Oriented, Rural LEO, or "BADGED COWBOY"
Certified MN Carry Permit Instructor


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:11 am 
Journeyman Member

Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 64
Location: Roseville
I haven't fired the new HK45 yet, but it is slightly smaller than a fullsize HK USP45. The HK45 is 7.52" overall length and 1.42" wide. It (the HK45) has interchangable backstraps, so it could be configured for a smaller hand. There is also an HK45 compact version that is 7.2" overall and 1.42" wide.
I have many flavors of HK's and have found them to be very reliable firearms.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:13 am 
Journeyman Member

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:15 pm
Posts: 88
I'm a sig person, so I'd suggest maybe looking into a change in grip that makes it more comfortable, if that's a possibility. :) I know that my 226 grip is just ever so slightly on the large size (but still ok) for my hand, and my hands aren't huge. If I replaced the thick wood grips with thinner hogues, it would be a better fit for something like competition shooting.

I've shot a number of the HKs, but not the HK45. I found that from model to model they vary a lot in comfort and perceived recoil etc., even in the same caliber. I'd say see if you can shoot one before you buy it, of course.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:18 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
As much as I love my Beretta, the stock 92FS wouldn't work if you have small hands. The thing is a beast, especially with the Hogue grips I installed on mine.

The Beretta Vertec models might be worth a look. I think Gunstop still had the used-but-like-new .40 in stock last week.

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:02 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:54 am
Posts: 1242
If - you are not set on a .45 then consider the Sig 239 - in 9mm or .40 My wife has smaller hands and the grips on my Sig 229 are too much for her - she really likes the feel of the 239 due to the single stack mag. All the other features you asked for are included in the 239 and Hey! it a SIG!
:lol:

Mostly-


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:19 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 8:53 am
Posts: 239
What about the Sig SP2022.

http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/ShowCa ... ductid=121


What would be a better Law Enforcement caliber, .357 Sig or .40 Smith & Wesson?

I'm guessing the .40 S&W.


How is this one for handgrip size?


I want to go the range soon, and have an idea of 3 or 4 guns I want to try.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group